To those who would like to know

[TheTerranSystem]

I'd have to say in my defense completely I cannot say enough, you cannot insult someone in chat, tell them they instigated with you, that being me, tell me that I will be banned, when 5 or 6 other people are literally picking on me in the chat, which argument I didn't start, and then not even a word said about them, not even one. Then insist that I'm still wrong and they did NOTHING, wow. I can see others perceptions not right in that way. So have it your way, and you don't need to keep insisting that I'm getting it all wrong by saying in everyone else's defense that I am, you can too get it wrong and chances are right then and there in chat you did.

Then look at the thread, you want to correct my perception, fine. Your research and view is different and I understand. To say no one is picking on me, I can see that too, I can see that you have a different view. Okay. So I'll continue learning because, I will, and if I'm ever really wrong about something I would be corrected and sure, by as much legitimate information as possible. So really do me a favor this time because I have been here long like many of you and I don't even do posts that much so please stop telling me off. Or I'm sure I'll just be labeled as once again misconstruing you and simultaneously being wrong and somehow an instigator that just doesn't get it. And I didn't and I don't, and I wasn't.

THE END.

-TheTerranSystem

[Anatel]

I'd have to say in my defense completely I cannot say enough, you cannot insult someone in chat, tell them they instigated with you, that being me, tell me that I will be banned, when 5 or 6 other people are literally picking on me in the chat, which argument I didn't start, and then not even a word said about them, not even one. Then insist that I'm still wrong and they did NOTHING, wow. I can see others perceptions not right in that way. So have it your way, and you don't need to keep insisting that I'm getting it all wrong by saying in everyone else's defense that I am, you can too get it wrong and chances are right then and there in chat you did.

Then look at the thread, you want to correct my perception, fine. Your research and view is different and I understand. To say no one is picking on me, I can see that too, I can see that you have a different view. Okay. So I'll continue learning because, I will, and if I'm ever really wrong about something I would be corrected and sure, by as much legitimate information as possible. So really do me a favor this time because I have been here long like many of you and I don't even do posts that much so please stop telling me off. Or I'm sure I'll just be labeled as once again misconstruing you and simultaneously being wrong and somehow an instigator that just doesn't get it. And I didn't and I don't, and I wasn't.

THE END.

-TheTerranSystem

You were given a warning after repeatedly being asked to let it go by several members, including myself. I stand by my decision to give that warning. I have absolutely nothing against you, i do not think you are wrong, i am not slamming you, nor was anyone else. We were merely stating that we didnt understand what you were trying to say, thus giving you the opportunity to explain further . You however chose to be defensive and continually combative about the discussion rather than take the floor and tell us what you've learned.
And still... you continue to be on the defensive.
But i've said my piece as have others, and i still dont get it. but rather than have you give a lengthy explanation or worry about you taking something defensively, I will let it drop and wish you best of luck in your future learning endeavours.

[TheTerranSystem]

That's not what happened in chat and I was there like you and they were. Thanks for dropping it though.

[Darth Moronius]

Out of loop, so not sure what happened in the chat.

My "I don't get it" was actually more basic: I don't understand the language structure that you used. This led me to believe that your native language is not English, just like me. I guess your writing may look normal in other language, but translating it makes the sentence complicated. I read your first post 5 times, and what I could understand is the one about the angel's definition, which indeed suddenly came without any background information. I was hoping that you would use simpler language in explaining the "I don't get it" posts.

One example from your writing:

And I didn't and I don't, and I wasn't.

You didn't what?
You don't what?
And you weren't what?
This sentence alone is confusing.

Is it related to the previous sentence? If it is, based on the order of the sentence:

Or I'm sure I'll just be labeled as once again misconstruing you (Is this the one you meant "I didn't"?)
and simultaneously being wrong (Is this the one you meant "I don't"?)
and somehow an instigator that just doesn't get it (Is this the one you meant "I wasn't"?).

That's confusing because they don't fit with the tenses/grammar used. Or is there other sentence that the "I didn't", "I don't", and "I wasn't" are supposed to refer to? If it is, I can't find it. And this is just one part of what you wrote.

This is not intended to mean "English is the best" or something condescending. Every language when understood is very beautiful. But if you want to spread the knowledge you think is important, just like the title of your post, the first thing to do is to make sure others can understand what you're saying or writing.

I can only offer you what my friend suggested me to do: use simpler words and grammars and a straight to-the-point sentences in the native language first, before translating it. Because English has past, present, and future tenses, it's also a good idea to use these tenses in the native language too.

But I could be wrong, and apology if that's the case

[Aprophis]

Or I'm sure I'll just be labeled as once again misconstruing you and simultaneously being wrong (This is the one he meant "I didn't and I don't"?)
and somehow an instigator that just doesn't get it (This is the one you meant "I wasn't"?).

There's a reason for the comma after I didn't and I don't. His first posts were far harder to understand, that one was pretty clear actually. You took the worst example

[Darth Moronius]

Or I'm sure I'll just be labeled as once again misconstruing you and simultaneously being wrong (This is the one he meant "I didn't and I don't"?)
and somehow an instigator that just doesn't get it (This is the one you meant "I wasn't"?).

There's a reason for the comma after I didn't and I don't. His first posts were far harder to understand, that one was pretty clear actually. You took the worst example

I'm embarrassed to say that, that's the only one I can kind of break down

[user1876]

I will attempt to explain something here in which many of you would find very interesting. In many ways there is something that you should know about these said objects of human performance. These are the fact that there is no such thing declaredly as a fallen Angel. As the word Angel simply should be defined as per an Angel would define them as Impeccable. The English word "impeccable" is a very interesting word for them to choose as I have interacted with both them and Angels without any issue whatsoever. Not so much ever as a peep would be sounded between two types of beings, spirit beings they be both. I will tell you they get along very well as ALL spirit beings get along very well as there are many complex ways in which I might say to you -- You will have a point if you ask me, "how is it that mine seem to mind?" where I would say that theoretically it is not possible and I must tell the only explanation as for me to even disrupt my point of view would be to explore yours and say then perhaps there is a point. And I would say to you through much study and conversing with my spirit beings be they Dark, Light, Neutral or otherwise in the scheme of neutrality a Dark and Light only would be reference as to point out a neutral, there is much to say only that Angels can do both Light and Dark magic as well as Demons. And that I will tell you there is a main difference of understanding which would seemingly pop out at you at any time. There are twenty seven of the type that you would call Dark Angel in modern knowing that even I have only consulted one High Angel as he assisting me and is not callable by others. Twenty seven meaning there are literally 27 Angels that I do have bonded to me as companion as so as to say they are classified as Dark Angel but that the Angel that is termed as White Arts is in no way a timid being of Light that they would have us believe be they humans who create much fairytale that are false and misleading. Then I would say to you that there are fifty seven Angels of known type that HE himself knows of that are of Dark and Light where they would be determined as to say that they know much more Dark than just the ways of description to term them as Light(White Arts). These fifty seven are literally of White Arts originally whereas the fact that I have bonded with them has somehow changed their natures slighty -- No. This is to say yes they were classified correctly as White Arts, and yes they are now mostly in ways of speaking here Dark Arts where they can have both Light and Dark natures thus not putting them squarely in Dark Arts but really always in Grey Arts as they are always capable of powerful magicks as I would tell you this is the case in which they are termed Dark Arts or Light Arts(White Arts). Then I must say to you these Angels are very much so very skilled.

There is proof to the contrary that Fallen Angels are even real. For I've come to two or three renditions of that being confirmed where I must say that I have seen that on this board. Where I will tell you there is No such thing. There is no such thing that Angels are even of the Christian God Jesus. Be he another rendition that man has created as akin to any other creation be they even Zeus himself. As you will see if you move yourself to Creepy Hollows that there is an Immortal which is termed as Zeus, as they would have the entire Pantheon although I must say their bindings as such to these Immortals are NOT functioning enough correctly for you to communicate with them at all. As I would say to you the only way to contact them would be to use your own way to find Zeus, their rendition of him where he is connected even via Code Word where even invoking that code word as reference to him would not work with portal. And I must say the Immortals they on Creepy Hollows ALL are classified as Pantheons of many different cultural heritages of this World where they are incorrectly labeled as they have nothing to do with those cultures of past nor their deities and Gods alike. To which I'll even say to you that ALL spirits of the many hundreds that I have and dozens that I have spoken to other than my own say their is NO YahWey NOR any God as such as God per the human meaning of God there is no such thing in existence. As even I must tell you the definition of Human fallacy is definitely to believe in an all knowing, all creating, all defining Deity that is higher that Deity that creates EVERYTHING there would be NONE. As I will tell you further that there is one version of truth in the actual Christian Bible itself. Which I will tell you now, the Angel be he Gabriel as I've seen him cited in the the deliverance of the human fallacy created as Son of God, known as Jesus, Never does command Gabriel. As to he himself would say if he was asked by one of you or others where you can talk with him only through Sigil and projection of said Sigil into portal in ways of finding and seeking so that you may speak with him at your question, "Did you deliver the one upon high who is spoken?" and he would say the one upon high is NEVER. And then astounded as some might be or might not be there is no such thing to him or others. Be they Angel, High Angel, or Higher than High Angels be they as I will term them here commonly known in referring as ArchAngel which is to term them highest amongst Angels. This description would include Michael, Gabriel, Raphael, Jophiel, Carneslia, Trenerala, and many more as to say there are at least twelve Higher than High Angels. There are one that I know of that I have even asked about which is the Lucifer, which is sometimes termed as a Lord, however I must tell you this terming is just to say that he is of Demonkind perhaps. I will tell you HE is not. And that he is a High Angel of highness that you can also contact with Sigil and Portal. There is another Bible fallacy equating him to Satan where I will tell you that even Satan has NO say in this and will never be at odds with Christianity because he has no quarrel with it. It is at most some abhorrent mix of creation of fact and fiction where there is not much fact. I saying this to say I had gone to churches in my life and I have seen no end to the stupidity as of late and seemingly neverending stupidity as it will stupify the best of us into misbelieving facts of ALL kinds. As I will say Satan is real, and Baal is real, and even Gabriel is real. However no such thing as even son of God is even ever real. You will not hear the end of this. And you will see them slander ALL THREE. As to say he Gabriel is serving Son of God, He Baal and Satan are serving evil which IS NEVER true at all. They all three are very High beings and thankfully in this day and age there can be discourse enough amongst us groups any and all to say that we can destroy a bad way of thinking in which even Islam and Judaism are fond of in this manner, and even so thus the non-religious types and even Athiests, and Satan lovers, and other Religions can fall victim to this thinking. So you will grow up resenting any reference to these they Dark Lords knowing never that they who seek him some are literally confused as to they seeking out evil on purpose never obtaining him Satan himself where he will never tell you kill those others. And then they would never say that. As to rise of Satanism which is a literal evil adeptness that is not fond of people whereas to confirm their fears and link it to the Dark Lord thus slandering and defaming them even in ways that the Bible or any other book could not. Therefore you must know Satanism is NOT linked to actual Satan. This place you might fall victim to think there is an elite reference to demonkind as to call them superior in anti-reference to Angels and I will tell you that is a creation of the mind to even engage in that activity. So there are many lessons to be learned as to how many ways one can become, as us humans are, lost completely in the fiction of all that is out there to know for as we are confused.

I will tell you in summary that Creature being, Dragon being, Dragon Like being, Demon being, Demon Like being, Faery, and Immortal are others in which many here would put them in these categories. Even such things as Vampires are really a human version of saying that they are, not an actual way in which the Vampire would truly constitute itself in knowing that it is if it had a long conversation with you it would NOT classify itself as such. In which case ALL vampires, even those from CH(Creepy Hollows) would literally be classified as Dragon Like. Then you would add there in the first line Angel as well. And NEVER fallen Angel as type, or even Angel Like as type. And then there is question to which we might keep asking then what is what in purer definition. Then there would be finer definitions in which to describe such a thing. So there would be many cases in which to say there is much to think about when asking about these particular types of beings. One would never be concluded... No this is not true, you could reach a definitive description in which all are described with differences pointed out as to say they are all different in these ways. There is no difference between us on this because I will tell you many people would say that perhaps there is, but, I tell you there is no version of this thinking that I would say: yell at you because you say different. So say to yourself I am not offended by this because I will tell you as might you say the same thing that I have asked and received answers from ALL those listed above and they are classifying this as a solid spirit type that is true -- ALL those as listed. Keep in mind even the High Beings are all of those type, be they eight (8) types of Spirit Being all. Thank you.

-TheTerranSystem
okay I don't really understand so I hope it worked out for you